WATCH: AMM Told To Be More ‘Inclusive’ Following Tough Topics; KANSAS Fights For Right To Elect Supreme Court Again – FallMusical.com Critical Intel Briefing 7-30-26
LIVE VIDEO: Let’s Go, KANSAS!
DIRECT VIDEO LINK: https://gettr.com/streaming/p42bb0y996b
SHOW NOTES FallMusical.com Critical Intel Briefing 7/30/26
7/29/26 FallMusical.com Critical Intel Briefing
GOP Senator Claims ‘No Honest Person Pleads the Fifth’ After Fauci Hearing — Gets Immediately Reminded of Trump’s Own History – MEDIAite.com
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/gop-senator-claims-no-honest-person-pleads-the-fifth-after-fauci-hearing-gets-immediately-reminded-of-trumps-own-history/
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) claimed “no honest person pleads the Fifth” after Dr. Anthony Fauci’s hearing. He was promptly reminded that President Donald Trump has done the same.
Hawley was part of the committee that questioned Fauci on his Covid-19 guidance Wednesday. Throughout the hearing, Fauci repeatedly declined to answer questions by pleading the Fifth Amendment. Hawley began his line of questioning by answer Fauci a set of basic questions about what he was wearing and the room they were in. Still, Fauci refused to answer.
Later that day, Hawley posted a clip of his exchange with the former Chief Medical Advisor to the President on X/Twitter. He then declared that “no honest person pleads the Fifth.”
Critics of Hawley were quick to point out that Trump has used a similar strategy in the past.
The screenshots included in the above response were all referring to 2022 deposition involving Trump and New York Attorney General Letitia James. At the time, James and State of New York were looking into potential fraud within Trump’s businesses. Trump, as the screenshots indicated, pleaded the Fifth more than 400 times and called James “a renegade and out of control prosecutor.” Trump also claimed the investigation into his business was “the greatest witch hunt in the history of our country.”
‘You Are Not Recognized!’ Rand Paul Throws Out Fauci’s Lawyer in Stunning Clash at Hearing
MediaIte
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) threw an attorney representing Dr. Anthony Fauci out of the room in a shocking clash at Wednesday’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee hearing.
The wild moment happened at the end of Paul’s questioning of Fauci — in which the former head of the NIAID repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment and refused to engage. David Schertler, an attorney for Fauci who had been sitting behind his client, sat down next to him and tried to talk into the microphone.
“You’re not recognized, you’re not recognized!” Paul said. “If you are unruly, you will be removed from the proceeding.”
Schertler kept trying to talk, but his words were difficult to make out.
“You were told not to sit at the table,” Paul said. “You insist on sitting at the table. And we told you, you would not be recognized. You are not invited here for testimony, sir! You are being disruptive! Would you behave this way in a courtroom? No, because the judge would put you in jail. I can’t do that today, but I can have you escorted from the premises. So I would say, sir, sit quietly and don’t say another word.”
Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) told Paul he would like to hear from Schertler, but Paul denied the request. Eventually, he made good on his threat to kick Paul out.
“Security, please remove him from the room!” Paul said — as Schertler was escorted out. “Let the record state that Dr. Fauci will still have the advice of the other half a dozen attorneys that he brought along today.”
Afterwards, Schertler told NBC’s Julia Tsirkin what he’d intended to say, if he had been given the chance.
“Dr. Fauci has a valid Fifth Amendment privilege, and he has the right to assert it,” Schertler said. “That’s what I was trying to tell the committee, and that’s all I was trying to tell the committee.”
From The Free Beacon
Kansas voters will soon decide whether to keep the current system of nominating justices to the state’s Supreme Court or to replace it with direct elections.
Under the current system, candidates are vetted by a nine-member commission. After a series of public hearings, the commission selects three finalists that the governor selects from.
All voters, including independents, can vote on the proposed constitutional amendment Aug. 4. A “yes” vote on the ballot question would establish direct elections, while a “no” vote would keep the current system.
“This amendment gives the voters the right to elect the justices of the Kansas Supreme Court. The justices shall serve terms of six years, with the elections of justice positions 1, 2 and 3 to occur in 2028, positions 4 and 5 to occur in 2030 and positions 6 and 7 to occur in 2032, and every six years thereafter. The rules applicable for such elections and the designation of position numbers shall be provided by law. Any vacancy on the court for an unexpired term shall be filled at an election as provided by law.”
Kansas Pro-Life Voters Should Vote Yes on Elections for Supreme Court
State | Sarah Neely | Jul 27, 2026 | 4:40PM | Topeka, Kansas
On August 4, Kansans will have a chance to push back on a rocketing abortion rate that has grown exponentially in the years following the Kansas Supreme Court’s 2019 decision to enshrine abortion in the state constitution.
The case related to that 2019 decision was actually heard years before, but the pro-abortion Kansas Supreme Court waited to hand down its decision until there was a like-minded governor in place, along with a weaker Republican majority in the legislature.
This unprecedented move by the court ensured its decision to enshrine abortion in the state constitution could not be successfully challenged by the state legislature. Since then, the number of abortions across the state has increased 186%.
Currently, Kansas Supreme Court judges are chosen via nomination by the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. Four of the Commission’s members are chosen by the governor. After a public review process, the Commission submits three final nominees to the governor who then chooses one of the three to appoint as a Kansas Supreme Court Justice.
Four of the seven justices currently serving on the Supreme Court were chosen by pro-abortion Governor Laura Kelly in just the last six years, ensuring decades of the Supreme Court’s protection for the abortion lobby and a radicalized agenda that is deadset on stripping away every protection from children in the womb.
“Kansans can bring an end to this reign of abortion by voting ‘yes’ to the Kansas Elections for Supreme Court Justices Amendment,” says Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue. “By voting yes, Kansans will finally have a chance to vote for Supreme Court Justices that hold life-affirming values instead of watching our life-affirming laws be completely gutted by governor-appointed, pro-abortion justices.”
WATCH: Troy Newman explains why Kansans must vote “YES” on this amendment.
Recent decisions from the Kansas Supreme Court have resulted in an astronomical increase in abortions across the state, moving from just under 7,000 abortions in 2019 to nearly 20,000 abortions in 2024.
Abortion numbers for 2025 still have not been released, however, there is no reason to believe that number of nearly 20,000 will decrease. Operation Rescue predicts that number will only continue to grow, as the number of abortion clinics in the state have nearly doubled since 2019, when the Kansas Supreme Court first enshrined abortion in the state constitution.
“If you want proof that the abortion lobby knows passing this amendment is our best chance at reinstating pro-life laws,” adds Newman, “look no further than Planned Parenthood Great Plains, which is loudly opposing the amendment.”
In a recent New York Times article, Planned Parenthood Great Plains bragged that its Kansas clinics have seen a 700% increase in abortions since 2022, with 75% of women coming from out-of-state.
“Planned Parenthood is making money hand over fist,” says Newman, “all because the Kansas Supreme Court has devoted itself to shielding the abortion industry and stripping away more and more protections from children in the womb. If Kansans ever want the chance to restore life-affirming laws and see our Supreme Court uphold the sanctity of every human life, we must vote yes on August 4.”
“YOU’VE BEEN SERVED!” MI Sec of State Jocelyn Benson Served By Former MICHIGAN Attorney General Over Potential Involvement In Funding Hate Groups Like KKK While Member of SPLC Board
For those of you who don’t know – the SPLC is an organization that claimed for years to be an anti-hate group. But really, they were in the business of taking big money from radical organizations and donors to besmirch Christian organizations by calling them hate groups. Among their targets, Focus on the Family, the American Family Association, and other solid Gospel-based organizations.
From GETTR’s Daily news
As Francesca Hong threatens to take over the governorship of Wisconsin, really on behalf of foreign nationalists but officially for the Democrat Socialists, her Mother Country is advancing their version of the Air Force to hit America from the skies when the moment’s right.
Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) has reportedly developed a fifth prototype of China’s J-36 sixth-generation fighter jet, as new images and footage suggest significant design changes. The evolving aircraft features modifications to its nose, air intakes, engine nozzles, and landing gear, indicating that CAC is rapidly advancing its flight testing and design refinement in pursuit of air superiority against the United States. Aviation analyst Andreas Rupprecht noted that the J-36 program has progressed through at least three distinct configurations since its initial flight in December 2024. The rapid development of the J-36 underscores China’s commitment to enhancing its military capabilities amid ongoing strategic competition with the U.S.